Minutes, IBIS Quality Committee 12 April 2011 11:00-12:00 EST (08:00-09:00 PST) ROLL CALL Cisco Systems: * Mike LaBonte Ericsson: Anders Ekholm Green Streak Programs: Lynne Green Huawei Technologies: Guan Tao IBM: Bruce Archambeault IOMethodology: * Lance Wang Mentor Graphics: John Angulo Micron Technology: Moshiul Haque, Randy Wolff Nokia Siemens Networks: * Eckhard Lenski Signal Consulting Group: Tim Coyle Teraspeed Consulting Group: * Bob Ross Texas Instruments: Pavani Jella Everyone in attendance marked by * NOTE: "AR" = Action Required. -----------------------MINUTES --------------------------- Mike LaBonte conducted the meeting. Call for opens and IBIS related patent disclosures: - No one declared a patent. - Mike noted that Anders could not join us. AR Review: - None New items: Discussion of External Test spec: Mike: Should we define the keyword hierarchy first? - Bob: Two ways: - Model calls test setups - Test setups call models - We excluded pins from the tests - We should not be testing coupling, etc. - Mike: There may be multiple models for one test - Or it could be a pin - The test needs to be the caller - Bob: It has to document everything needed to produce the result - The names have to be distinct - Package models can be complex, tools may differ - Mike: We should be able to test s-params, ICM, EBD, etc. - Bob: There could be some problems making assumptions - Tools may handle coupling sections differently - Model selector would have to be given for pins - If it is too much it may not be adopted Mike: Could s2ibis generate these new test waveforms? - Lance: S2ibis has many limitations - One vendor has implemented golden waveforms - But it will not be open source - s2ibis3 is not ready for wide use - Bob: New work on s2ibis would have to be funded - Mike: Ambrish was the last to update it - Lance: s2ibis is not good for production processes - Bob: I use it but make corrections to the models - Bob described process steps for producing reference data - Have to document when the input threshold is reached - Mike: We might want data to declare the transition offset - Anders' idea of giving stimulus as a list of times should help - SPICE simulations usually have dead time to reach steady state - Bob: Leading edge removal is an important tool - Mike: Could we add some data to hep align the waveforms? - Bob: One technique is to determine the optimal delay mathematically - Or try different shift offsets to find peak correlation - FSV has to deal with this - Mike: The FSV1D tool makes the user line them up - Bob: The timing test load is used to figure out the offset for timing Mike: Should we drop back to bi-weekly meetings? - Bob: We have been struggling on this topic - We need to focus on the test data as the primary driver - We should skip next week because Anders will not be there We decided the next meeting would be Apr 26 Next meetings: - Next meetings Apr 26 and May 03 Apr 26 agenda: - Review external test BIRD draft Meeting ended at 12:03 Eastern Time.